Here are some portraits with the Canon EOS RP in different portrait situations. Right now, it’s not an A camera for me. It’s more of a third option. For video it’s really nice though. Again, I don’t have any native RF glass yet, I have to use the older EF lenses via the adapter. While many have praised Canon EF glass for years, they really haven’t upgraded most of the designs in ages, so lenses like the 35mm 1.4L and 24mm 1.4L go back like 20+ years. The little camera has a nice in camera lens correction feature for vignetting, CA, and distortion, but the nature of certain Canon 1.4 is that you just have to stop them down to get any resemblance of clean technical images. Having said that though, most of my friends could care less about pixel peeping images, and just enjoy the fact that it has a flip out turn around screen for selfies and fun pictures. 🙂 Onward with some samples and what I’ve gleaned from the EOS RP .cr3 RAW files in Canon’s Digital Photo Pro software.
The first image was intentionally overexposed in camera, at +3. Bringing the 26MB uncompressed raw file into DPP and moving the exposure slider back -3, you have the picture in the middle (which is probably unusable). The third image is -1.5, which for this particular lighting situation is probably the best case scenario if you wanted to rescue the highlights. Canon’s sensors have never been about high dynamic range or the ability to rescue images in post. You pretty much have to be on it when it comes to exposure. I’m thinking I might shoot compressed .cr3 raw’s from now on since a 26MB file has way less DR than even a D7000 at 16MB.
One thing I have enjoyed with the RP is Canon’s new face detect plus eye autofocus. With certain lenses like the EF 35mm 1.4 and traditional DSLR’s (5D’s etc), the focus recompose method just does not work since that changes where the focus plane lies. This is one example where the new tech really does help and erases the old conventions of the past. The other day I was browsing books at the Goodwill and came across an old school photography book from the 1980’s. It’s crazy how one could seriously just throw it all away. Some of the knowledge is good and forever useful, like the differences in PSAM modes, but times have really changed. Imagine new camera buyers today just getting into photography. Their first cameras would most likely be the Canon RP or Sony A7III. That’s a heck of a lot of advanced tech to get started with. Myself, I started with an old Minolta Maxxum film camera, was a very early adopter of digital imaging in the 90’s, and then really jumped into DSLR’s with the Nikon system in the early 2000’s. I like to always say, the difference in the cameras from every generation are minute (and the goalposts are always moving), but the differences in the people that use cameras are vast.
The image above was shot into the sun via the EVF. The software options for boosting shadows in DPP is pretty poor, this is about the best you can do. Moving the exposure slider would be better, but of course you’d be left without any blue or color in the sky and background. (I know this is an extreme situation most cameras would struggle in, next time I’ll test out the RP with off camera flash and ND filters) One could export two images at different brightness levels and blend the two in photoshop, but I think most Nikon shooters like myself have been spoiled for so many years. As in the following example:
The above example is from a Nikon D600 (a much “hated” camera that came out in Oct/Nov of 2012). I still use mine because I just know it so well, and the results I can get from the raw files are still top tier in my opinion. The pic above was an underexposed studio shot (flash didn’t go off). With other cameras you’d normally just delete a photo this dark since upping the exposure in post will create some ugly noise patterns (like horizontal banding in Canon’s), but the dynamic range in these modern Nikon tuned Sony sensors is just crazy. Obviously you’d want to shoot as correct as possible in camera, but there are plenty of situations where having a robust raw file from a Sony or Nikon camera can save you. Examples would be: shooting a backlit dancing wedding couple, the matrix meter will always render dark, shooting dark on purpose to be able to hold a specific shutter speed and boost the gain/ISO in post.
On a side note, I browse used camera and lens prices often. It’s crazy to see how unwanted the D600/D610 is due to the problem with dust and oil getting on the sensor, which makes for small aperture landscape photos very annoying in post, but I’ve found if you only shoot things at f/2.8 and lower, none of it shows up. The malleability of the Nikon .nef’s is still amazing. Hopefully going forward there will be a steady supply of cheap D600’s for the foreseeable future. It’s a really good sleeper camera that I would suggest if you really like editing photos like me.
Okay, back to the Canon RP images, examples of the different white balances you can toggle in post. I would have to say this camera is “warmer” than previous generations of cameras. If you are looking for a “5D” type of feel, Auto WB White priority is suggested:
As far as me, I think I’ll forever be a traditional DSLR person. There’s just too many advantages in that “old” form factor and design. Before anyone jumps ship to any all digital electronic mirrorless camera, I would suggest going to the store and seeing if the features are what you need, and most importantly in my opinion, do you prefer viewing the world through optical glass with a camera that barely sips power and is always ready to fire like a good blaster by your side, or do you prefer taking pictures with an electronic screen, real time image preview and a bunch of creature comforts like in a modern car. They are all good technology to document our limited days here with friends and family. Enjoy the first days of Spring everyone!